Hej IdaTak for meldingen. Som jeg f

Hej Ida

Tak for meldingen. Som jeg forstår det er det så en validering af om varen har én af disse, som ikke bliver meldt ind på NV.
Det er vigtigt vi får rettet valideringen således at den også accepterer at hvis der i udbudsplanen står Månedens kup, kan der overføres til NV.

Hvis det blot er at tilføje denne variabel i valideringen bør det være løst med dette…. ellers vend tilbage.

Det er vigtigt at dette ikke påvirker valideringen mod salgsaktivitet hvor vi fortsat skal kunne overføre som Månedens kup.


De bedste hilsner Bo

Resultater (Engelsk) 1:

Hi IdaThanks for the announcement. As I understand it, is it a validation of whether the item has one of these, who are not being enrolled on NV.It is important we get corrected validation so that it also accepts that if in the contract plan says this month's coup, may be transferred to NV.If it is just to add this variable in the validation should be solved with this .... otherwise return.It is important that this does not affect validation against sales activity in which we are to continue to be able to transfer as this month's coup.The best regards Bo

Resultater (Engelsk) 2:

Hello Ida Thanks for the message. As I understand it, it is as a validation of the product have one of these, which are not registered in NV. It is important we get directed validation so that it also accepts that if the tender plan stands Month coup, can be transferred to NV. If it is just to add this variable in the validation should be solved with this .... otherwise return. It is important that this does not affect validation against sales activity, where we continue to be able to transmit the Month coup. Best regards Bo

Resultater (Engelsk) 3:

idathank you for your message. as i understand it, it is a validation of whether the product has one of these, which are not reported in nv.it is important we get addressed validation so that it accepts that if in udbudsplanen says the coup, there can be transferred to nv.if it is just to add this variable in the validation, it should be solved with this... otherwise, turn back.it is important that this does not affect the validation against sales activity where we continue to transfer as the coup.best regards live