Dette er fuldt ud i stand til at kø

Dette er fuldt ud i stand til at køre et par lysår af tidsspor,så et spørgeskema bør have en begrænser som f.eks. "I denne organisation_________?"
Dette er også en betragtelig proces! Og den kan give en masse svar. Så der bør være god plads ved hvert spørgsmål. Ved derefter at kombinere de navne,der er blevet givet,vil du have et navn, der forekommer langt oftere end resten. Dette gøres ved at tælle navne. Du foretager derefter en efterforskning af denne person. Det, der normalt gøres,hvis det ikke er en fjende,er at udstede en ikke - enturbuleringsforordning og sige hvorfor.

Resultater (Engelsk) 1:

This is fully able to run a few light years of time track, so a questionnaire should have a limit such as. "In this organisation_________?"This is also a significant process! And it can provide a lot of answers. So there should be plenty of room for each question. By then combining the names that have been given, you will have a name that occurs far more often than the rest. This is done by counting names. You then carry out an investigation of this person. What is usually done, if it is not an enemy, is to issue a non-enturbuleringsforordning and say why.

Resultater (Engelsk) 2:

This is fully able to drive a pair of light-years of time traces as a questionnaire should have such a limiter. "In this organisation_________?"
This is also a significant process! And give a lot of answers. So there should be plenty of space for each question. By then combining the names that have been given, you will have a name that occurs far more often than the rest. This is done by counting names. You will conduct an investigation of this person. It normally done if it is not an enemy, is to issue a non - enturbuleringsforordning and say why.

Resultater (Engelsk) 3:

This is fully able to run a few light years of tidsspor,so that a questionnaire should have a limit such as "in this organisation_________? "
this is also a significant process! And it can give a lot of answers. So there should be good space for each question. Then, by combining the names,which have been given, you will have a name, which is much more often than the rest.This is done by counting names. You then makes an investigation of this person. What would normally be done,if it is not an enemy,is to issue a not - enturbuleringsforordning and say why.