Artikel 2 hævder, at selv om den er

Artikel 2 hævder, at selv om den er enig med det faktum, at det at tale et fremmedsprog flydende, er en fordel for nogen, men ser det ikke som en nødvendighed. Hævder, at det ikke påvirker britiske økonomi i en så ekstremt måde som beskrevet i tekst 1. in text 1.

Resultater (Engelsk) 1:

Article 2 claims that, although it agrees with the fact that it is to speak a foreign language fluently, is a benefit for someone, but don't see it as a necessity. Claims that it does not affect the British economy in such an extremely way as described in the text 1. in text 1.

Resultater (Engelsk) 2:

Article 2 argue that although it agrees with the fact that speaking a foreign language fluently is an advantage for anyone, but do not see it as a necessity. Claiming that it does not affect the UK economy in such an extreme way as described in the text 1 in text 1

Resultater (Engelsk) 3:

Article 2 argues that, even if it agrees with the fact that talking a foreign language liquid, is a benefit to anyone, but do not see it as a necessity. Claims that it does not affect British economy in a way so extreme as described in text 1. in text 1.