Man betragter hverken mennesket som

Man betragter hverken mennesket som oprindelig godt eller ondt, men derimod som et væsen har man retten og evnen til at vælge mellem det gode og det onde. Derfor er problemet, at Alex ganske vist bliver helbredt i samfundets øjne, men da han ikke selv har valgt det, ligger hans dårlige side under facaden, og han venter bare på at han kan løsrive sig. Alex giver os derfor en godt eksempel på det evige problem, at man for at kunne vælge det gode, også må have mulighed for at vælge det onde.

Resultater (Engelsk) 1:

You look neither man is originally good or evil, but rather as a creature has the right and the ability to choose between good and evil. Therefore, the problem is that Alex admittedly will be healed in society's eyes, but when he does not even have chosen it, is his bad side under the façade, and he is just waiting for that he can secede. Alex gives us a good example of the eternal problem, that in order to be able to choose the good, also must have the option to choose evil.

Resultater (Engelsk) 2:

One sees neither man originally good or evil, but as a being has the right and ability to choose between good and evil. Therefore, the problem is that Alex admittedly are cured in society's eyes, but he did not choose it, is his bad side in the facade, and he's just waiting for him to break away. Alex gives us, therefore, a good example of the eternal problem that in order to be able to choose the good, must also be able to choose evil.

Resultater (Engelsk) 3:

You look at either man as originally good or evil, but rather as a creature has the right and the ability to choose between good and evil. Therefore, the problem is that it is true that Alex is treated in society's eyes, but, as he does not even have chosen it, is his bad side of the facade, and he just waiting for that he can become loose.Alex gives us a good example of the eternal problem that, in order to be able to choose the good, must also have the opportunity to choose the evil.