VI ser ikke mennesket som godt elle

VI ser ikke mennesket som godt eller ondt, men derimod som et menneske, der har retten og evnen til at vælge mellem det gode og det onde. Problemet med Alex er, at han ganske vist bliver helbredt og accepteret i samfundets øjne, men da han ikke selv har valgt det, ligger hans dårlige side under facaden, og han venter bare på at han kan løsrive sig. Alex giver os derfor en godt eksempel på det evige problem, at man for at kunne vælge det gode, også må have mulighed for at vælge det onde.

Resultater (Engelsk) 1:

We do not see people as good or evil, but rather as a human being who has the right and the ability to choose between good and evil. The problem with Alex is that he certainly will be cured and accepted in society's eyes, but when he does not even have chosen it, is his bad side under the façade, and he is just waiting for that he can secede. Alex gives us a good example of the eternal problem, that in order to be able to choose the good, also must have the option to choose evil.

Resultater (Engelsk) 2:

WE do not see man as good or evil, but as a man who has the right and ability to choose between good and evil. The problem with Alex is that he indeed gets healed and accepted in society's eyes, but he did not choose it, is his bad side in the facade, and he's just waiting for him to break away. Alex gives us, therefore, a good example of the eternal problem that in order to be able to choose the good, must also be able to choose evil.

Resultater (Engelsk) 3:

We do not see people as good or evil, but as a human being, who has the right and the ability to choose between good and evil. The problem with Alex is that he admittedly is treated and accepted in society's eyes, but, as he does not even have chosen it, is his bad side of the facade, and he just waiting for that he can become loose.Alex gives us a good example of the eternal problem that, in order to be able to choose the good, must also have the opportunity to choose the evil.