En Scientologi leder,der ikke håndt

En Scientologi leder,der ikke håndterede Dev-T (udviklet og unødvendig trafik) fra en statslig myndighed i overensstemmelse med vores Dev-T-Policy, da den var off-line og off-policy, forårsagede for nylig en forstyrrelse. En embedsmand var off-policy (hans eget kontors), og denne Scientologi leder fulgte ikke vores procedure med at (a) sende det tilbage til kilden, (b) korrigere policy-fejlen og (c) informere hans overordnede,da resultater ikke blev opnået. Man siger: "Jamen, det er jo vildt! At styre en statslig myndighed med Scientologi admin?" Alt, hvad jeg kan sige,er,at det skabte vanskeligheder, da vi ikke gjorde det. Åbenbart er det ikke "dem" og "os". Det er kun "os" og et falsk "dem". Så alt, hvad vi behøver at gøre, er at give dem deres hatte på, og de bliver os.

Resultater (Engelsk) 1:

A church of Scientology leader who has not handled the Dev-T (developed and unnecessary traffic) from a State authority in accordance with our Dev-T Policy because it was off-line and off-policy, recently caused a disturbance. An officer was off-policy (his own Office), and this Scientology leader did not follow our procedure to (a) send it back to the source, (b) correcting policy failure and (c) inform his superior, since the results were not achieved. They say: "well, it's the game! To manage a State authority with Scientology admin? " All I can say is that it created difficulties, because we didn't do it. apparently, it is not "them" and "us". It is only "us" and a false "them". So all we need to do, is to give them their hats on, and they are us.

Resultater (Engelsk) 2:

A Scientology leader who did not handle Dev-T (developed and unnecessary traffic) from a state authority in accordance with our Dev-T Policy, as it was off-line and off-policy, caused recently a disturbance. An officer was off-policy (his own office) and this Scientology leader did not follow our procedure of (a) send it back to the source, (b) correct policy error and (c) inform his superiors when results were not obtained. They say, "Well, that's wild! To manage a state authority Scientology admin?" All I can say is that it created difficulties when we did not. Evidently it is not "them" and "us". It is only "us" and a false "them". So all we need to do is give them their hats on, and they are us.

Resultater (Engelsk) 3:

A Scientologi leader,not handled Dev-T (developed and unnecessary traffic) from a State authority, in accordance with our Dev-T Policy, since it was off-line and off-policy, caused a recent disturbance. An official was off-policy (his own office), and this Scientologi leader did not follow our procedure to (a) send it back to the source,(B) correct policy error and (c) inform his superiors,since results were not achieved. You say: "Well, it is, of course, wow! To control a state authority with Scientologi admin?" all that I can say,is,that has created difficulties, since we did not. It is evidently not "them" and "us". It is only "us" and a false "them". So all we need to do, is to give them their hats,And they will be us.