Artiklen som vi gerne vil analysere

Artiklen som vi gerne vil analysere, handler om det er det værd at bruge penge på rumforskning eller om det skulle have gået til mennesker på jorden, som lider af fattigdom og sult. Mark fortæller hvor interessant, han synes det er, at vi har udforsket andre planeter, hvor vi bandt andet har sendt en lille rumsonde ud til Merkur, som også er den nærmeste planet til solen, for at studere det. Men han diskutere så om det har været det hele værd at bruge pengene på rumforskning eller om det skulle have gået til noget bedre. Her kommer han ind på, at selvom der er blevet brugt op til billarder af dollars til rumforskning, så har det faktisk ikke været spilde af pengene. Han hæver at rumforskning er afgørende for vores fremtid. Han udpeger at når det kommer til menneskelidelser, så er det ikke pengene der er problemet. Han mener at selv hvis alt pengene, der gik til rumforskning, blev brugt på mennesker i jorden, så vil det ikke løse problemet. Han kommer med eksempler på hvordan der har været store fundraising indsats internationalt gennem årene, og selv regeringerne har givet milliarder i ulandsbistanden, så har vi stadig ikke set så stor fremskridt i det. Og hæver igen at det skyldes pengene ikke er svaret. Han argumentere også hvordan rumforskning faktisk har haft en positiv effekt på os, idet vi har kunnet udvikle nye teknologiske designs, og det at vi udforsker rummet faktisk har hjulpet os med at forstå vores egen planet. Han ender ud med at sige, at han vil lade læserne drage deres egne konklusioner, og understreger en sidste gang at rumforskning er en god ting, og det med til at skabe vores fremtid.

Resultater (Engelsk) 1:

The article that we want to analyze, acting on it is worth it to spend money on space research or whether it should have gone to people on Earth who suffer from poverty and hunger. Mark tells how interesting, he thinks it is that we have explored other planets, where we tied the second sent a small spacecraft out to mercury, which is also the closest planet to the Sun, to study it. But he discuss as if it has been worth it to spend the money on space research or whether it should have gone to something better. Here he comes in on that, although there has been used up to bill millions of dollars for space research, as it has not actually been a waste of money. He emphasises that space research is crucial for our future. He shall designate that when it comes to human suffering, so it's not money that is the problem. He believes that even if all the money that went to space research, was used on humans in the Earth, so it will not solve the problem. He comes with examples of how there has been major fundraising efforts internationally through the years, and even Governments have given billions in foreign aid, so we still have not seen as much progress in it And raises again that it is due. money is not the answer. He also argue how space research has actually had a positive effect on us, because we have been able to develop new technological designs, and we explore the space actually has helped us to understand our own planet. He ends up by saying that he will let the readers draw their own conclusions, and underlines a last time that space research is a good thing, and it helps to create our future.

Resultater (Engelsk) 2:

The article that we want to analyze is all about it's worth spending money on space research or whether it should have gone to the people on earth who suffer from poverty and hunger. Mark tells how interesting, he thinks it is that we have explored other planets, where we tied else has sent a small spacecraft out to Mercury, which is also the closest planet to the sun, to study it. But he discuss as if it has been worth it to spend the money on space research or whether it should have gone to something better. Here he comes into that, though there has been used up to billiards of dollars on space research, it has not actually been wasting of money. He raises to space research is crucial for our future. He points to when it comes to human suffering, then it is not money that is the problem. He believes that even if all the money that went to space research, were used on people in the ground, then it will not solve the problem. He comes with examples of how that has been great fundraising efforts internationally over the years, and even governments have given billions in foreign aid, we still have not seen as much progress in it. And again raises that it is because the money is not the answer. He argued also how space exploration has actually had a positive effect on us, because we have been able to develop new technological designs, and we are exploring space actually helped us understand our own planet. He ends by saying that he will let the readers draw their own conclusions, and emphasizes one last time to space research is a good thing, and it helps to create our future.

Resultater (Engelsk) 3:

the article which we want to analyse, is it is it worth spending money on space research or whether it should have gone to people on earth suffering from poverty and hunger. mark tells how interesting, he think it is that we have explored other planets where we tied second sent a small shuttle out to mercury, which is also the nearest planet to the sun, to study it. but he discuss then whether it has all been worth it to spend the money on space research or whether it should have gone to something better. here he comes into that, although there has been used up to billarder of dollars on space exploration, it has not actually been wasting money. he raise to space is crucial for our future. he shall designate that when it comes to menneskelidelser, then it"s not the money that is the problem. he believes that even if all the money that went to space, was spent on the people of earth, so it will not solve the problem. he comes with examples of how there has been a great fundraising efforts internationally over the years, and even governments gave billions in aid to developing countries, we still have not seen so much progress in it. and raise again that it is because the money is not the answer. he argue how space actually has had a positive effect on us, as we have been able to develop new technological designs, and we are exploring the space actually have helped us to understand our own planet. he ends by saying that he will leave the readers to draw their own conclusions, and stress one last time to space is a good thing and it to create our future.